[Unixbench] さくらVPS 3コア・2GB（東京リージョン）
さくらVPS 3コア・2GBでUnixbenchを取ってみました。リージョンは東京です。
更新日: 2018.7.17公開日: 2017.9.6
※数値は2017年9月6日現在のものです。
テスト環境
| 項目 | スペック |
|---|---|
| CPU | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz * 3コア |
| メモリ | 2GB |
| ストレージ | SSD 50GB |
| OS | Ubuntu 16.04 |
| 月額料金 | 1,706円 |
OSインストール直後のプレーンな状態で、他のタスクは何も動いていない前提です。
Unixbenchのインストール&実行
$ sudo apt-get install make gcc git
$ git clone https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench
$ cd byte-unixbench/UnixBench
$ ./Run
結果
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
3 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
3 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
3 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
3 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
3 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 x Process Creation 1 2 3
3 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
3 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: tk2-252-35518: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.4.0-62-generic -- #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 18 14:10:15 UTC 2017
Machine: x86\_64 (x86\_64)
Language: en\_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (5200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
13:39:27 up 12 min, 1 user, load average: 0.52, 0.29, 0.11; runlevel 2017-09-06
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 06 2017 13:39:27 - 14:07:33
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34857390.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3635.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3778.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1129284.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 308365.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2479337.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2248315.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 54165.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9303.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10721.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2865.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3650430.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34857390.3 2986.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3635.4 661.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 3778.6 878.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1129284.4 2851.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 308365.8 1863.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2479337.1 4274.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2248315.6 1807.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 54165.4 135.4
Process Creation 126.0 9303.4 738.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10721.2 2528.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2865.4 4775.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3650430.0 2433.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1561.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 06 2017 14:07:33 - 14:35:41
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 103515310.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10893.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13700.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1123373.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 302283.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3278364.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6741523.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 494457.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 35625.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 26455.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3362.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6832240.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 103515310.0 8870.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10893.8 1980.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 13700.4 3186.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1123373.5 2836.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 302283.6 1826.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3278364.9 5652.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6741523.0 5419.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 494457.4 1236.1
Process Creation 126.0 35625.8 2827.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 26455.7 6239.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3362.1 5603.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6832240.7 4554.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3612.8
同価格帯のクラウドサーバー・Google Compute Engine f1-smallが1029.8だったので、シングルコアでもGoogle Compute Engine f1-smallに勝ってます。劇的にコスパがいいですね。
これくらいのスペックになると、CDNなどを上手に使えば、通常のサイトなら100万PVとかでも余裕で捌けそうです。